data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a41/10a411f7a1fc4bd5454af31f6d3da1e43ae19863" alt=""
Here's one from 1841:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30465/30465c6d2b2edbae126171ad58e7e6b49cd880da" alt=""
1839:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/06f12/06f1212c3f291fd35f3ad9fb4b88498797a06e94" alt=""
Finally, sometimes I save the most interesting stuff for last for those who are still reading.
Here's an attempt to explain a strange character in a Palmyrene inscription in this book by analogy with abbreviations in rabbinical writing (using interesting typographical characters):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e24f5/e24f55b9367d01c350d7b15ed711ece32e99220e" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1928a/1928ad3ede0ea6f554188e86aad31257c959c718" alt=""
Here is S. Salome, the author's, pretentious yet touching finish to that book:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e963a/e963a98a828c9efcb5dc4b6878cbe07c97b2103d" alt=""
This is from the book Narrative of a journey from Constantinople to England (1828):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c99c/1c99ce980c1da9ae67730c7224b328d0f824d014" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94556/94556732f57eeeed987459cc5d13544877ef1bc1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bc56/9bc56bb58729732e8e5b68c5ca31fc6e0dc3d5b2" alt=""
It's interesting that the Ikkarim pertaining to the nature of God (i.e. his unity, his preexistence) have been left out. I always thought they were sort of redundant nowadays.
ReplyDeleteWait a second! where is Techiyat Hametim! Oy vey!
Interesting, huh? I have no idea where this guy got it; if he copied it exactly, edited it himself.
ReplyDelete#1 in the Ladino ("Rashi" script) reads "...Y no a otro" =and it is not appropriate to pray to an other. The "Roman characters" version and the translation get it wrong.
ReplyDeleteThank you. I have a hunch that it is deliberately wrong.
ReplyDeleteOf course "milot" is a misreading for "mitzvot" (the tzadi does look like a lamed), but somehow the translation came out right.
ReplyDelete