tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post153217249350328958..comments2024-01-21T02:58:08.208-05:00Comments on On the Main Line: Could it be?Mississippi Fred MacDowellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02734864605700159687noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-78027090228207609242012-12-25T16:32:43.810-05:002012-12-25T16:32:43.810-05:00i have a catalogue of a turn-of-the-century smiths...i have a catalogue of a turn-of-the-century smithsonian exhibition curated by cyrus adler that contains the image. at first i thought i stumbled upon an unknown photo, but then realized it was from wickes.Abbahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06147724170190982376noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-4368574718045970982012-12-25T12:06:50.000-05:002012-12-25T12:06:50.000-05:00Very good, very good.Very good, very good.Pactura Observahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04312077443316784070noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-75201094209039470752012-12-25T11:22:08.730-05:002012-12-25T11:22:08.730-05:00Yes, but I interrupted my Nittelnacht moratorium o...Yes, but I interrupted my Nittelnacht moratorium on Toyre to point it out, and I don't get any credit! That's like shaving on Sfire so as not to ruin someone's party, and not getting a hat-tip!<br /><br />(OK, it wasn't exactly Toyre, so it was more like washing or combing one's unkempt beard during Sfire.)Gabriel Wassermannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-79481820131669826412012-12-25T11:12:53.111-05:002012-12-25T11:12:53.111-05:00I was going to look it up!I was going to look it up!S.http://onthemainline.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-42026918487061451512012-12-25T11:09:42.484-05:002012-12-25T11:09:42.484-05:00And I don't even get a hat-tip?! ;-)And I don't even get a hat-tip?! ;-)Gabriel Wassermannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-85814065664908208882012-12-24T22:06:56.499-05:002012-12-24T22:06:56.499-05:00Ha. Forgot that Wickes was Gen. 27. This is reprod...Ha. Forgot that Wickes was Gen. 27. This is reproduced from Wickes. Case closed.S.http://onthemainline.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-8574987258174809222012-12-24T21:55:44.829-05:002012-12-24T21:55:44.829-05:00Yes. The ones published by Wickes and Joseph Segal...Yes. The ones published by Wickes and Joseph Segall are famous. So I'm asking about this one. I am drawing a blank. Dare I speculate? Too early. S.http://onthemainline.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12600498.post-44034000027928387712012-12-24T21:53:20.647-05:002012-12-24T21:53:20.647-05:00Weren't several pages of the Codex photographe...Weren't several pages of the Codex photographed before the riots?<br /><br />The WolfBrooklynWolfhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03994285019137108636noreply@blogger.com